The 2026 Medicare Fee Schedule Gave You a Raise. It Also Took Some Back

Medical Billing / RCM

Your practice administrator saw the headline: Medicare payments are going up in 2026. Then the first remittance advices came in, and the numbers did not feel like a raise at all. If your reimbursement is not matching the announcement you read back in November, you are not imagining it. The 2026 fee schedule gives with one hand and takes with the other, and most practices are still untangling which parts apply to them.

See the regulatory, denial, AI, and reimbursement shifts shaping RCM in 2026. Read the Mid-Year 2026 RCM Review →

The Increase: Real, But Split in Two

The CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule delivered the first positive payment update for physicians in several years. Congress built in a one-time 2.5% increase to the conversion factor, and for the first time, that increase split into two separate conversion factors. Practices participating in qualifying Alternative Payment Models receive $33.57, a 3.77% increase. Practices that do not qualify receive $33.40, a 3.26% increase.

 

That half-point gap between the two conversion factors is not trivial at scale. A practice billing high Medicare volume that has not evaluated its APM participation status is leaving money on the table every single claim, all year long.

 

The Efficiency Adjustment: The Part Most Practices Missed

Here is the part that did not make the headlines. CMS also finalized a negative 2.5% efficiency adjustment applied to most services on the fee schedule. That adjustment offsets a meaningful share of the conversion factor increase for many specialties, and the Medicare Economic Index increase for 2026 sits at 2.7%, meaning physician payment is still not keeping pace with the actual cost of running a practice.

 

Site-neutral payment policy adds another layer. CMS reduced indirect practice expense allocations for facility-based services while increasing them in the non-facility, or office, setting. If your practice bills across both settings, the net effect on your revenue depends entirely on your specific payer mix and site distribution, not on the headline percentage.

 

Before you can project your 2026 revenue with any confidence, your billing team needs to model these changes against your actual claim volume, not the national average. Here is where to start:

  • Confirm your APM participation status. The 0.51 percentage point gap between the two conversion factors compounds across every Medicare claim you submit this year.

  • Model the efficiency adjustment against your top codes. The negative 2.5% adjustment does not hit every service equally, so identify which of your highest-volume codes are most exposed.

  • Reassess your site-neutral exposure. If you bill services in both facility and non-facility settings, the practice expense reallocation changes your numbers differently in each.

  • Track the Medicare Economic Index gap. A 2.7% cost increase against a 2.5% to 3.77% payment increase means real margin pressure even in a "positive" rate year.

  • Watch for the Ambulatory Specialty Model. CMS finalized plans to launch this mandatory model in January 2027 for heart failure and low back pain care, with payment adjustments beginning in 2029.

 

Why Modeling Matters More Than the Headline Number

A single national percentage rarely reflects what happens on your practice’s actual remittance advices. The only way to know your real 2026 impact is to run your top procedure codes and payer mix against the new conversion factors and the efficiency adjustment together, not separately. Practices that skip this step often discover the "increase" they expected barely covered their cost inflation for the year.

 

This is exactly the kind of regulatory shift that a billing system built on decades of claims data should be catching automatically, not something your team should be reverse-engineering from a remittance advice three months into the year. For the full picture on where CMS regulatory change fits into the broader 2026 revenue cycle landscape, including prior authorization and audit trends, see our mid-year revenue cycle outlook.

 

Want to know exactly how the 2026 fee schedule changes affect your specific payer mix and top procedure codes? A Revenue Health Review models the real numbers against your practice, not the national average.

 

Ready to see what AI built into 49 years of specialty-specific EHR looks like in practice?

Request a Live Demonstration and see the Medics Suite working in your practice’s actual workflow. A real person answers in under 2 minutes at 1-800-899-4237 ext. 2264.

Sources & Citations

1. CMS, "Calendar Year 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule (CMS-1832-F)" (conversion factors, efficiency adjustment, APM split)

2. AMA, "What to Expect from the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule" (conversion factor context)

3. Holland & Knight, "CMS Releases CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule," November 2025 (Ambulatory Specialty Model, site-neutral policy)

4. MGMA, Financials and Operations Data Report, 2025 (practice revenue benchmarking context)

About Gene Spirito, MBA

Gene has been involved in sales and deploying well over 1,000 revenue cycle management and billing solutions for medical practices, groups, networks, and laboratories of every specialty. With more than 25 years’ experience, Gene has guided so many ADS clients toward the configuration that would work best for them such as services through MedicsRCM, or in-house automation with the MedicsCloud Suite. Gene has an undergraduate from Villanova University, and an MBA from Temple University. Not surprisingly, Gene’s an avid Wildcats fan (the VU basketball team). Feel free to reach out to me directly: 484-758-7331